The XBox’s Shift

Recently it seems that the XBox 360 is making a move away from its roots as a console for gamers, with titles such as Gears of War and Halo, to where it is also suitable for family and party gaming.

The move towards a more family oriented console was first seen with the New XBox Experience that was launched in November. This added avatars, the XBox equivalent of Nintendo’s Miis. It also added in lots more sound effects when performing actions and changed the interface drastically so there were bigger pictures of what options were available at each stage. The changes in interface are for the better, and do make the XBox easier to use, but there’s no mistaking that they also make it more family friendly.

As the run up to Christmas draws towards a close, it is no coincidence that the adverts for games are more for those where the family can get involved,  with titles such as Mario Party 8 and Rayman Raving Rabbids TV Party for the Wii and Little Big Planet for the PS3 getting advertised heavily, alongside the XBox’s latest weapons in this arsenal; Lips, You’re in the Movies and to a lesser extent Scene It!.

This shift places the XBox in an interesting middle ground, where it is appealing to families on one side, and more serious gamers on the other side with this year’s release of distincly non-family games Grand Theft Auto 4 and Gears of War 2. Of course, this means that it is now open to a wider audience, and could well increase the console’s lifespan.

 

Reduction in VAT – Part 2

So, the other weekend I commented briefly on the (at the time) rumoured reduction in VAT, which was later announced in the pre-budget report last Monday. This has now come into force this week, with retailers advertising “early VAT reductions” in the run up to this, presumably as a way of tempting customers to spend during the week that I predicted would be quite light on the spending (despite spending over £100 myself).

Of course, there’s not a huge amount that a 2.5% reduction will give you. It certainly won’t help you on regular shopping – and the 2.1% reduction in overall price is hardly something to write home about, especially when compared to the discounts in the sales that will no doubt start before we’re actually at Christmas.

But hey, it’s all fine right? We’re still saving some money now and chances are that most of us won’t get hit with the new 45% tax right… so it’s got to be good! Well – not for everyone. One of the things that people don’t seem to take into account is the amount that will have to be spent on re-printing everything with a VAT rate on it, which will particularly hurt small businesses who likely don’t pay VAT anyway as they’re not registered – meaning that they’ll have to take on the cost themselves. Sure, it’s still spending – but it’s not really what the government would have wanted I bet.

Add into this the massive cost in terms of lost productivity from every development team that realised that they’d make a bit of a cock up when they hard-coded 17.5% in there. It’s not going to have been a cheap move, and no doubt will not have been completed everywhere.

I guess over the next thirteen months we’ll see if this has any noticeable effect in terms of average spending and attempting to avoid the recession that everyone keeps on banging on about.

 

Updates

Hmm… it seems that I’m updating the blog software more than I’m updating my blog… perhaps I should try and write stuff more often. Perhaps with the impending holiday season I’ll be able to do so.

Still, this post marks a year to the day that I started this blog… and the rate at which I’ve posted stuff has been erratic to say the least so the above should come as no surprise really.

 

Reduction in VAT

So, the government may be looking to reduce VAT by 2.5% to the lowest allowable by the EU (15%), or so BBC News informs me. They claim that in doing so they’ll encourage people to spend more, boosting the encomy and hopeully helping us reduce the affects of any recession; but will it have the desired impact.

While this might sound good to start with there are a few things to consider. As the article points out, we’re likely to have to put up with increased taxes in the long run to compensate for the lost revenue, and we’re probably going to have to increase our national debt in order to cover for it in the short term if we want to maintain the level of funding for services.

There’s also the problem that people might now wait for the reduction to kick in before they’re willing to part with money, although Christmas will likely force people to spend anyway. This of course has the problem of decreasing spending further while people wait for the reduction to roll round and will therefore damage the economy more in the immediate future.

Finally there’s the cynic in me saying that the consumers might not see much of this decrease. Pretty much all the prices in shops are with VAT included, so people don’t really know how much of that is VAT, and therefore the savings that get passed on (if any) could easily be less than they should be. This will lead to companies making more money, which I suppose is possibly a good thing if we want to boost the economy, but is bad for the consumer whichever way you look at it.

Whatever happens it’ll be interesting to see how this pans out.

 

Ubuntu Eee

So, having had my Eee and put up with Xandros for over six months, I finally caved recently and installed Ubuntu Eee on it. This is a customised version of Ubuntu using the netbook UI and with a number of tweaks to things to install the OSD and other Eee-related packages by default.

Install was easy, running off my USB stick that I had set up following instructions on the Ubuntu Eee website – with the traditional live-USB style beforehand so I could test that things work.

So far things are good, and in installing it over the recovery partition too I’ve managed to gain some more space for things I want to install, which is certainly nice. The one issue I have encountered is that the wifi seems to be stuck in some sort of powersaving mode as it works in bursts, which is a touch annoying, but I haven’t looked at this properly yet.

The interface is intuitive and good, very similar to the default Xandros one in terms of the large icons on the home app that sits above the desktop and all in all I like the way it works.

 

Office 2007

At work I spent a reasonably large amount of time dealing with email or instant messaging with co-workers, all of which is accomplished through Microsoft products – Outlook for email and Office Communicator for IM.

By default both of these are the 2003 versions, and there’s always been a number of things that have annoyed me. So when a co-worker recently pointed me in the direction of the internal pilots for newer versions of both of these, I set about installing them.

The first, and most noticeable difference, is obviously the appearance. Office 2007 has famously done away with conventional menus and toolbars in favour of the ribbons, although seemingly not across all applications in all circumstances as Outlook only uses them when editing individual items (be they emails, calendar entries or tasks). Office Communicator 2007 also has a UI change, heading towards the Microsoft Live Messenger style, which is probably better than ribbons as there’s not really much scope for them in an IM application. Aside from the obvious niggle that neither of these applications now fit with the rest of the look and feel of my operating systems, the interfaces are actually usable and the ribbon makes a lot of sense.

Moving on from the initial visual impressions and onto the new features, a number of the things that annoyed me appear to have been fixed (such as only being able to search for contacts in communicator in ‘Surname, Firstname’ form – although it doesn’t yet go as far as working by mailid) and there are a number of new features that I like (such as being able to view other people’s calendars in overlay mode with your own).

Communicator 2007 also now stores the conversation logs in a folder in Outlook, making it much easier to find the conversation you had with someone last week compared to the previous implementation we had involving a (often broken) web interface, and also offers an easy way to view previous logs when a conversation has been resumed.

The addition of document previews and image resizing in emails within Outlook is good too, allowing for a quicker look at the contents of attachments without having to load other applications – although it appears we are yet to acquire previewers for PDF files.

I’ve yet to use the other applications properly – having only viewed a couple of Word documents briefly, but if my experience with the editor in Outlook is anything to go by they’re certainly quite usable. The popup formatting element when you select text, for example, is very useful for quickly editing documents.

So far the only downside I’ve discovered, is that they might use slightly more RAM, which can be somewhat of an issue given my machine needs more memory at the best of times when running the variety of other applications that I need to do my job at times.

All in all, Office 2007 and Office Communicator 2007 are a good improvement over their predecessors and I’m happy with them so far.

 

English Football

So, this week saw the end of the first transfer window in the English football season, and therefore lots of high profile movings for large amounts of money (especially with Manchester City getting a cash injection from their new owners). This got me thinking about the state of English league football, and I don’t like it.

It’s been going on for a while really, with the domination of Manchester United and Arsenal of the Premiership (between them winning all but one of the first 12 seasons of the league’s existence) and the presence of Chelsea and Liverpool within the group that have become known as “the big four” – a name not given to them for the average weight of their players, but their bank balance.

With the exception of Blackburn Rovers (who were the one exception to Manchester United/Arsenal’s rule of the first dozen seasons) the only team to have won the premiership is Chelsea, who first lifted the trophy at the end of the 2004-05 season and retained it the following year. Of course, it comes as no surprise that they managed this after a large cash injection from their newfound Russian owner, Roman Abramovic. Many accused them of buying the title, which is a fair comment, but also a fair tactic.

These days it seems that the league is more and more about how money you can invest in buying players at the inflated premiums they seem to have at the moment. Manchester City, as mentioned above, have recently acquired a large cash injection and used this to break the English transfer record with their shock purchase of Robhino. Reports are also around that they’re willing to offer local rivals Manchester United up to £133million for Christiano Ronaldo when the January window opens. This is just ludicrous, but the owners want to get some silverware, and this is the way they’ve chosen to go about it.

All of this, to me, makes the league far less entertaining. You can predict, with almost certainty, that one of the big four will win the league, and it probably won’t be Liverpool. You can guess that the smaller teams, probably those recently promoted such as Hull and Stoke, will get relegated – and you know that the rest will fall somewhere in the mediocraty between. It’s not that fun.

Contrast this, however, to different leagues in other sports such as American football’s NFL. In this league there are salary caps, stricter rules on transfers between teams (with free agents and restricted free agents etc), sharing of revenue from television and ticket sales between teams regardless of size and, by no means least, the draft. In this each year the worst team from the previous season gets to select the player they most want from those coming into the league from college football, giving them the opportunity to get the best new player before the other clubs (who pick in order of success with the Superbowl winners going last). All in all this leads to a league where, as the phrase goes, on any given sunday any team can beat another – regardless of form, as was shown with the Superbowl upset this year where the Giants beating the Patriots (who had been unbeaten and had beaten the Giants at the end of the regular season).

Of course, there’s no way FIFA could introduce something similar into football now, the leagues are far too established and there’d be uproar from fans of the currently successful clubs. It’s also worth remembering that the premiership has penalties for finishing low down (relegation), where the NFL has anything but. With this in mind I guess we’re going to be stuck watching the big four continue their dominance, and perhaps we’ll see Man City make something of the millions of pounds of investment, but for entertainment – I’ll be glad happily watching the NFL now that the season has started again.

 

Google Chrome

So, google took a step into the browser market this week with the announcement (and subsequent launch) of Chrome, their webkit based browser. This has been widely blogged about as an interesting move, for various reasons.

Of course, the technology is the first one, with the process-per-tab model being there to stop it from crashing horribly when one tab is dealing with a website that decides to go off on one. A nice idea indeed, as is the idea of jailing off plugins in a similar way (I’ve got pissed off with Flash taking down Firefox at work now, so am currently running with Flashblock enabled to stop this). In a strange turn of events, Microsoft actually got there first with the process-per-tab idea with IE8, so I’m sure it’s only a matter of time before Firefox and other browsers look into it.

The main thing, however, that caught my attention was the idea that they’d get much of the market share. As much as we hate it, Internet Explorer has the majority of this, and in the corporate environment things aren’t too likely to change any time soon (especially not with webapps still being deployed that make use of activex controls and broken rendering). This leaves us with Firefox in a comfortable second, albeit miles behind, then Opera, Safari and some other browsers (I’ve not researched this, I’m just going on what makes sense). So where would Chrome fit in?

To my mind, there are two groups of users when it comes to browsers – those who are stuck in their ways using IE, and those who are happy to switch. Obviously the first group is a lost cause, so lets look at the second. This savvy group has already abandoned IE for some other platform, be it Opera or Firefox. To my mind (and at least in my own experience), they’ve likely got whichever browser they picked configured how they wanted; with the extensions and plugins they want installed and set up. Everything just works.

So, how do Google then get these users to move to Chrome? It’s an interesting puzzle. So far (having not used it myself due to the lack of Linux build) people seem impressed with the speed, but miss their extensions (especially an adblock one – which I’m sure google would love to implement) and have found that it is possible to crash the whole thing. Convicing these users to move over is clearly going to take more than a bit of a speed improvement over Firefox. People will want their extensions, and this provides an interesting technological problem for Chrome if it wants to stick with the jailing that they seem to have happily advertised everywhere in their documentation.

Of course, it’s still very early days, and I’ve yet to use it – so will reserve judgement on how well it works until I have – but it’ll be interesting to see how it does in the marketplace.

 

A Year of Employment

So, a year ago I started my work – leaving behind the long hours of doing nothing that I had previously enjoyed up until that point. The time until now has seemingly flown by, and it seems strange to think about doing nothing for quite as much time as I previously did.

In the year since I started work I’ve experienced a wide variety of aspects of the business, doing development work for three separate groups – each with their own individual quirks and ways of doing things. I’ve also spent time in the US with the training programme, where I learnt a whole host of new skills, and expanded upon some existing ones. Finally, I’ve also got to know a whole host of other people and have thoroughly enjoyed myself throughout the whole thing.

Going from doing nothing to working an average of forty five hours a week was a bit of a jump, but now it seems like the norm. Sure I’m not averaging a huge amount of sleep during the week, but I’ve got the weekend to relax and get stuff done in, so I don’t actually feel like I’m missing too much – especially as I still find time to see my friends and do things outside of work. Of course, some days drag and it seems like it takes forever to get to 6:30 (when I usually leave) but then there are those that fly by and I find myself confused when the automated e-mails just after market close start arriving.

All in all I’m still enjoying work, and I’m glad that I can say that. It’ll be interesting to see where I am in a year’s time, and what I’m doing, especially given the rapid nature of the industry and the change that the dynamic economic climate often results in.